Over the last several years,
the City of Greater Sudbury Minor Sports Associations have received
only 80% of their ice requirements due to a lack of available and
affordable ice in a convenient location and at an appropriate time
for young children. The issue has been further challenged by the
recent closures of several additional recreational facilities
throughout the region.
A search for a viable and
sustainable solution has
been on-going for the past several years. Numerous studies and
investigations have taken place throughout this community with
various consultants and partners in an attempt to address the
availability of affordable
prime time ice for our
youth in The City of Greater Sudbury.
In an effort to address the
current and on-going demand for accessible and affordable prime time
rental ice requirements, The former City of Sudbury commissioned a
study to investigate, analyze, and document the user demand, ice
rental rates, and the physical and financial state of repair of the
6 existing stand alone city arenas, including the 10 additional regional
facilities within a half hour drive of the City core.
The study resulted in the
adoption of a Strategic Business Plan for the City of Sudbury Arenas
in December of 1998. Some of the
key findings of the study
are as follows:
|
| |
 |
· |
|
Regional Ice supply has been
declining over the last 7 years (Closure of Regional
facilities – Markstay, Dowling, Capreol, Falconbridge, Barrydowne) |
|
· |
|
Ice Demand has been rising over the same period |
| · |
|
Sustained ice demand is projected
over the next 20 years |
| · |
|
7.4 ice pads are required to meet current city core demand |
|
·
|
|
There are currently 5 existing City core owned and operated “stand
alone” arenas |
|
·
|
|
There are currently no privately owned arenas within the City or Region |
|
· |
|
The cumulative annual operational
deficit paid by the taxpayers for the 6 city owned and
operated arenas totaled $230,000
for the 1997/98 operating season (Includes Barrydowne) |
| · |
|
Extensive capital expenditures will
soon be required to maintain current aging “stand alone”
Municipal arenas throughout the Region. |
| |
|
|
|
The
Strategic Business Plan also investigated a strategy for the development
of alternative replacement facilities. The
key recommendations of the
Strategic Business Plan for City Arenas are as follows: |
| |
|
 |
· |
|
De-commission older existing “stand alone” facilities and replace with
Multiple ice pad efficiencies
(economy of scale) |
|
· |
|
Investigate alternative, less capital intensive uses for older
facilities in disrepair. |
| · |
|
Adopt an
“embrace & enhance” strategy for a newer existing facility |
| · |
|
Countryside Arena and Sudbury Arena are the best “embrace & enhance”
candidates |
|
·
|
|
Develop
new facilities within a “Sports and Family Entertainment Centre” context |
|
·
|
|
Incorporate the financial and operational benefits of a Public/Private
Partnership |
| |
|
|
As a result of the study process, the former City of Sudbury and the
Minor Sports Associations recognized an opportunity to address the
on-going lack of prime time ice as well as appropriate tournament
facilities within the region. In March of 1999 a proposal call was
issued by the former City of Sudbury for the submission of proposed
developments for a multi-pad ice facility at Countryside Arena or
Sudbury Arena.
The Citys’ strategic goals of this Proposal were as follows:
|
| |
|
 |
· |
|
Construct additional ice
pads by year end (2000) |
|
· |
|
Design new facilities
that include new amenities such as a sports lounge, childrens areas and
family entertainment center |
| · |
|
Reduce the operational
deficits of the existing arenas |
| · |
|
Develop a Public Private
Partnership for the new facility to maintain the debt free status of the
community |
|
·
|
|
Create an economic driver
through tournaments, competitions or other related visitor/tourism
events. |
|
·
|
|
Generate an operational
surplus by the year 2002 |
|
·
|
|
Position the city as a
model community for the development and management of ice facilities |
| |
|
|
|
On March 11, 1999, Perry + Perry
Architects Inc. successfully responded to this proposal call with a
comprehensive and innovative submission for the development of The Sudbury Youth
Development and Tournament Centre, a Multi-Pad Ice Facility to be
located at Countryside arena. |
|
|
The Preferred
Solution
Program:
In
general, the preferred option most supported by the surveyed Minor
Sports Associations consists of a 4-pad addition to the
existing municipally owned Country Side Arena in The City’s south
end. In an effort to address a multitude of Prime time ice
availability, affordability and program delivery issues, the concept
innovatively proposes that 3 of the 4 newly constructed ice pads are
developed with an ice surface dimension of 65’ x 150/ rather than
typical NHL dimensions of (85’x200’). The proposed dimensions
equate to exactly ¾ scale of an NHL surface, yet consume only 57% of
the area required for full scale NHL construction.
The fourth new pad will be designed and constructed in the full 85’
x 200’ NHL format. This configuration and approach best reflects
the community need, maximizes the number of available ice pads and
minimizes the relative capital expenditures to construct the
building.
From a programming perspective, the intent is to focus all house
league programs for children, from beginners to age 12, on the new ¾
ice surfaces. This approach not only frees up the existing larger
full-scale ice surfaces throughout the community for the older age
minor sport participants and adult programs, but also provides a
more suitable instructional format for youth. The 3/4 ice
configuration will also allow for all current existing minor sports
house league programs (beginner to age 12) to be delivered at one
location, under one roof and exclusively during weekend primetime
hours. This approach also provides the participating children and
especially their parents with the ice time convenience and
regularity that cannot be accommodated under current municipal
operating conditions.
Although the development will promote the consolidation of Youth
Development programs and is primarily meant to address the issue of
prime time ice availability and affordability, the project will also
be designed and developed in the context of a “Sports Tournament and
Family Entertainment Centre”.
In
addition to the innovative ice surface configurations previously
described, it is proposed the development will incorporate related
complimentary support spaces including but not limited to the
following: |
 |
· |
|
Full service family theme
restaurant and sports lounge (overlooking ice surfaces) |
|
· |
|
Sports medicine clinic
and conditioning centre |
| · |
|
“Local Legends” Sports
Hall of Fame |
| · |
|
Ice skills and family
games centre |
|
·
|
|
Food concession kiosks |
|
·
|
|
Skate rentals area |
|
·
|
|
Skate and equipment
repair services |
|
·
|
|
Storage locker rental
area |
|
·
|
|
Party room rental
facilities |
|
·
|
|
Laundry facilities and
services |
| |
|
The facility will
provide visitors with a full Family Entertainment experience with
ancillary revenues focused on offsetting and maintaining affordable ice
rental rates to the Youth Participants and their families in our local
Minor Sports Associations.
With recent
advances in ice rink technology and as indicated on the attached concept
drawings, the resulting configuration offers conversion flexibility from
a 5-pad youth tournament/competition center (Ages 3-12) to a 3-pad
senior Tournament/Competition Centre.
The new ice
surfaces have intentionally been designed to accommodate a variety of
ice surface dimensions and configurations. Depending on the present
and future functional need and market demands, this concept offers the
flexibility to adapt to and reflect the requirements of a multitude of
tournaments, programs and special events.
The
¾ ice configuration is also expected to attract rapidly growing and
popular Men’s 3 on 3 hockey tournaments and leagues which utilize the
reduced ice surface dimensions of 65’ x 150’. In addition, summer use
as an in-line hockey (multi-sport) development and tournament center has
been investigated as well as the feasibility of utilizing the over
120,000 sq. ft. of indoor area to attract a multitude of new special
events, trade shows and conventions to Northern Ontario. |

 |
|
Preferred Site:
With a sensitivity
towards “youth” participation and development and a desire to minimize
cost and maximize affordability, the development proposal will be
focused at the Countryside site in the City’s south end. The selection
of this location as the development site will take advantage of not only
the existing buildings pre-designed expansion capabilities but also a
reduced capital construction cost, exceptional public access and
parking, and consistency with the City’s long term plan and development
goals. Other considerations include land availability and current
zoning, project timing and scheduling, child and family safety and
security concerns, and the overall “appropriateness” of the site and
surrounding area as a “Youth” Development and Tournament Centre.
The following
conceptual drawings reflect the general design concept, and the
relationship of the new construction to the site and existing building: |
|
|
|
 |
| |
Partner
Relationships & Responsibilities
Currently,
Municipalities find it difficult to provide the human resources and
financial commitment necessary to orchestrate, finance and operate
community based capital projects without experiencing on-going operating
deficits once the facility is up and running. Independent non-profit
volunteer minor sports associations lack the time, expertise,
organizational skills and financial capital necessary to meet the needs
of successful project and partnership planning.
The Public/Private
partnership is intended to provide project facilitation and equity
financing through private sector initiatives. By partnering with the
Municipality and the Minor Sports Associations, the Private Sector
offers the planning, capital and organizational tools required to
realize a successful and sustainable community project.
The model for this
proposal is based on the formation of a Public/Private Partnership made
up of The City of Sudbury, the private sector and related non-profit
Minor Sports Associations throughout the community. Other user groups
and potential partners contacted in this regard include Laurentian University, Cambrian College,
and College Boreal as well as the Sudbury Regional Soccer Association.
A Preliminary List
of the Non-Profit
Minor Sports
Association partners is as follows: |
| |
| Association |
|
1998/99
Participants |
| |
| Sudbury
Chasers Speed Skating Club |
|
27 |
| Sudbury
Figure Skating Club (SFSC) |
|
267 |
| Copper Cliff
Skating Club (CCFSC) |
|
172 |
| Sudbury
Ringette Association (SRA) |
|
135 |
|
Sudbury Playground Hockey Association (SPHL) |
419 |
| Sudbury &
District Girls Hockey (S&DGHA) |
|
242 |
|
Copper Cliff Minor Hockey Association (CCMHA) |
446 |
| Sudbury
Sports North (SSN) |
|
458 |
| Sudbury
Minor Hockey Association (SMHA) |
540 |
| Adult Hockey |
|
643 |
| Sudbury
Regional Soccer Association (SRSA) |
(+/-) 5000 |
| Indoor Lacrosse
Association |
(+/-) 300 |
|
| TOTAL |
(+/-) 8,700 |
| |
|
The partnership
model would include the establishment of a Sudbury Youth Development and
Tournament Centre Partnership (SYDTC) responsible for the Planning,
Design & Construction of the new facility as well as operations and
management of both the new and the existing facility. Equity financed
by the Private Sector, the model allows for (and in fact encourages)
investment by the independent non-profit Minor Sports Associations.
Proceeds can therefore be directed back to the Minor Sports Associations
in proportion to their investment share further reducing the cost of
Youth Development & participation.
The viability of the
project is premised on the Municipality temporarily transferring
ownership, operations and management responsibilities of the existing
property to the SYDTC for at least the debt financing phase of the
development. It is important to note that in
this relationship, the value of continued ownership of the existing
facility would be retained by the Municipality.
A graphic
representation of the proposed Public/Private Partnership model is as
follows: |
| |
|
 |
| |
Proposed
Management Structure
It is proposed that
the management structure reflect that of the Public/Private Partnership
Model previously described. As indicated, the SYDTC partnership will be
established for the purpose of holding capital assets and orchestrating
the project planning design, operations and facility management. A
joint advisory committee is proposed within the SYDTC partnership that
will assist with policy development and provide recommendations to
facility management and staff.
It is expected that
representation from The City and the participating Minor Sports
Associations will be a reflection of their relative involvement in the
Partnership. It is the intent that the proposed joint advisory
committee will act as a quality control mechanism to ensure compliance
with The Municipal Operating approach and Philosophy.
Policies would be
designed to meet the needs of the community with primary
responsibilities of the committee focused on facility maintenance,
quality standards and pricing policies.
User Group Support
The success of this
approach and concept is of course conditional on support by the Minor
Sports associations and other user groups within The City. On January
21, 1999 the development team met with representatives of all
Minor Sports Associations as well as Laurentian University & Cambrian
College and introduced the partnership approach, the site and the ¾ ice
surface development concept. The results of a survey conducted at
this meeting of Associations and institutions has indicated overwhelming
support of the development option presented in this proposal along with
an excitement and eagerness to finally address the ice availability,
affordability and access issues. In addition, 97% of the survey
respondents indicated it was very important to their association or
institution and beneficial to this community to implement and develop
this project as a Sports Tournament and Family Entertainment Centre.
The Development Team
has also met with each Minor Sport Association including the Sudbury
Regional Soccer Association as well as Laurentian University on an
individual basis and have since received letters of acknowledgement and
support.
Preliminary
discussions with Laurentian University have indicated their willingness
to entertain a partnership with SYDTC pertaining to their undergraduate
human kinetics degree program. It is anticipated several other
partnerships may be formed with Laurentian as well as other local
educational institutions in other areas of the Facility Management and
Operations.
Project status
Perry + Perry
Architects have displayed an on-going commitment for several years to
the development of an innovative multi-use leisure facility concept for
this community. Countless hours and significant dollars have been
invested to introduce an innovative and unique project model to meet the
expectations and requests of the Citys March 1999 proposal call.
After receiving
acknowledgement from the former City council that this proposal was the
preferred proposal of choice, the project has endured the political
transition from a two tier to a single tier municipal government and
has received endorsement from the transition board
responsible for implementing the political transition.
The City of Greater
Sudbury is now currently undergoing a supplementary and comprehensive
leisure services master plan scheduled for completion in the
spring of 2004. The findings of this study are expected to serve as our
new and improved guiding principles for the development of future
leisure activities and support facilities in light of the changing
political landscape, demographics and leisure service expectations of
the community. We trust their findings will again lead Council to recognize
that the basic principles this proposal and concept will remain
unchanged and well suited to this community.
We therefore look
forward to bringing this innovative initiative back to the council table
for refinement and implementation in the very near future. |